Wednesday, February 19, 2014

Not only did this sharp to ownership of a rule I have some political objections against a bad start

When Peter Rylander visited our school | Calandrellas blog
This blog is almost never about my school. I'm trying namely keep my private life (relatively) private (as I have not yet come up with how much information about my personal life, I want to share the infinite generally known as the Internet), and keep my blogging policy fedics food services (I do not want to become a non-moderate variant of Blondinbella). Well, today I make an exception, partly because it does not strictly relating to my personal life, and partly because what is now happening at my school, at least in some sense can be described as politically (and whether the definition of politically can apolitical blogging also be brilliant and interesting). So what happened in school?
It all began last Friday (I think it was), then our mentors told my class that "on Wednesday" (ie today) would be a lecturer at the school, a certain Peter Rylander, best known for having been a presenter for the program Amigo, who would talk about respect. The bulk of the class had seen the program, it seemed, and it was a tad reluctant as I looked forward to Wednesday - I have some reservations with regard to lecturers about "respect", especially if they have been speeded presenter of children's programs. What I mostly looked forward to was actually the excellent opportunity this occasion would offer to get a photo to the article on Rylander on Wikipedia, if I just in time managed to get hold of a camera: my old are gone.
Somewhat fedics food services disheartened, I went today to the school this morning, later than usual (lecture meant that the start of school was postponed by an hour) - I had not managed to get hold of a camera. The article on Wikipedia (which I had not had time to check if it even existed, because I've been busy with homework and the like at home) would remain Picture Los. Well, I was looking me up to the auditorium, and high school students sat down soon settled into the pews (and a few ones from a nearby school). Almost the entire college was also present, and soon I saw Peter Rylander himself: he did not look quite like I remembered him from the TV, but on the other hand is my memory of a few years old children's pretty fedics food services bad.
When he started talking, I felt, however, clearly recognize the voice, but something separated it from the super-speeded and almost constant hysterically excited tone it has had on Amigo: Peter Rylander was angry. At least that was my initial impression. He said very clearly to us to take off our coats to show respect, and turn off our cell phones. I tend to self never wear my outerwear indoors, fedics food services but many in my class freezes for real if they do not have it, especially like in the winter, and I have, therefore, and as the only motive for such a rule is that for our sometimes quirky culture considered impolite to wear coats indoors, protested fedics food services much against non-outerwear-indoors rule at our school.
Not only did this sharp to ownership of a rule I have some political objections against a bad start to the lecture in my eyes: the worst thing was that some students undanlät fedics food services to follow (the polite and neutral but as I said very clear) call. Peter Rylander counterattack, fedics food services then on to tell how he did not think it was a respectful behavior, then he spent several weeks planning for this lecture and traveled far to carry it (he seemed - reasonably - frustrated). He raised his voice quite badly when he told the students fedics food services to take off their coats. The worst was a classmate who never at the urging of teachers taking off his hood, and refuses to discuss it, and I was however relieved when Peter did not make a big deal of it, but went ahead and left it at that.
Peter Rylander told that what he had to say to 100 percent was true and in accordance fedics food services with both his own and the College's conviction. He said it was wrong to tease and similar obvious. But anything that deviated from the usual moral lectures was how he told it. He stood calmly in front of the podium and said straight up and down, he thought, but he illustrated all the time with examples, and used in extremely high degree body language to portray and give weight to what he said - he flängde around on the podium like a madman, and at times I feared fedics food services for the survival fedics food services of a houseplant he twice had almost over. Although the tone he used in a way I have never before heard a man do in a non-musical contexts: one moment he almost shouted, and second he whispered. Everything was designed to reinforce the importance of what he said, and given the recent response seemed he succeeds, at least my classmates listened more koncensentrerat than on any conventional lesson.
What did he do? Well, Peter spoke of respect, and he spoke of empathy. Again and again he returned to the need to work with both the brain (pointing to head) and

No comments:

Post a Comment